Pelican vs Storyblok
Please select two different options.
Pelican and Storyblok are both content management systems, but they cater to different needs. Pelican is a static site generator, ideal for developers who prefer simplicity and control over their website’s structure. Storyblok, on the other hand, is a headless CMS that offers a user-friendly interface for content creators to manage and publish content across various platforms.
General information
Pelican
Storyblok
Introduction :
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Introduction :
Storyblok is a headless CMS that was launched in 2017. It is known for its user-friendly interface, flexible content modeling, and powerful visual editor. Storyblok is popular among developers and content creators for its ability to create and manage content across different platforms seamlessly. It offers a range of integrations and is open source, allowing for easy customization and scalability.
Storyblok is a headless CMS that was launched in 2017. It is known for its user-friendly interface, flexible content modeling, and powerful visual editor. Storyblok is popular among developers and content creators for its ability to create and manage content across different platforms seamlessly. It offers a range of integrations and is open source, allowing for easy customization and scalability.
Advantages :
- Easy to use and beginner-friendly interface
- Fast loading times for websites
- Strong security features to protect content
- Customizable themes and plugins for flexibility
- Good for small to medium-sized websites
Advantages :
- Easy-to-use visual editor for content creation
- Flexible content modeling with custom fields
- Seamless integration with various technologies
- Fast and reliable content delivery via CDN
- Scalable for projects of any size
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steeper learning curve compared to others
- Lack of built-in SEO features
- Limited plugin and theme options
- Less user-friendly interface compared to competitors
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Higher cost compared to some competitors
- Limited built-in features and functionalities
- Lack of robust SEO capabilities
Website users : Thousands
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Website users : Thousands of websites
Storyblok is used by a significant number of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for web development.
Storyblok is used by a significant number of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for web development.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Storyblok requires some initial learning, but with its user-friendly interface and documentation, users can navigate through it relatively easily.
Getting started with Storyblok requires some initial learning, but with its user-friendly interface and documentation, users can navigate through it relatively easily.
Year launched : 2002
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Year launched : 2017
Storyblok was launched in 2017, making it a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems on the market.
Storyblok was launched in 2017, making it a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems on the market.
Official website :
https://www.pelicanweb.org/
Official website :
https://www.storyblok.com/
Commercial details
Pelican
Storyblok
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Storyblok is not fully open source, but offers a limited version of its platform for open source use.
Storyblok is not fully open source, but offers a limited version of its platform for open source use.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Storyblok offers a free plan with limited features, suitable for small projects or personal websites. Hosted option available.
Storyblok offers a free plan with limited features, suitable for small projects or personal websites. Hosted option available.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Storyblok offers a paid option with additional features and support, providing more flexibility and customization for users.
Storyblok offers a paid option with additional features and support, providing more flexibility and customization for users.
Platform details
Pelican
Storyblok
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Storyblok offers a hosted option for users, providing convenience and ease of use without the need for self-hosting.
Storyblok offers a hosted option for users, providing convenience and ease of use without the need for self-hosting.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
⚪ Self host : Unknown.
Self-hosting options for Storyblok are not clearly stated, but there may be third-party vendors available for hosting.
Self-hosting options for Storyblok are not clearly stated, but there may be third-party vendors available for hosting.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
🟢 Headless CMS : Support natively.
Storyblok is a headless CMS by design, allowing users to create content and deliver it through APIs to any platform or device.
Storyblok is a headless CMS by design, allowing users to create content and deliver it through APIs to any platform or device.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
Static content generation is possible in Storyblok through third-party plugins, offering flexibility for users who require this feature.
Static content generation is possible in Storyblok through third-party plugins, offering flexibility for users who require this feature.
Key features
Pelican
Storyblok
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
Storyblok offers robust content management capabilities through its plugin system, allowing for seamless integration with various platforms and tools.
Storyblok offers robust content management capabilities through its plugin system, allowing for seamless integration with various platforms and tools.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Storyblok is a good platform for blogging when enhanced by popular 3rd party plugins/extensions for added functionality and customization.
Storyblok is a good platform for blogging when enhanced by popular 3rd party plugins/extensions for added functionality and customization.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Storyblok can be used for e-commerce with third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for online stores.
Storyblok can be used for e-commerce with third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for online stores.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Storyblok does not natively support community/forum features but can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
Storyblok does not natively support community/forum features but can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Support for content subscriptions/paywalls can be enhanced through third-party plugins/extensions in Storyblok.
Support for content subscriptions/paywalls can be enhanced through third-party plugins/extensions in Storyblok.
Other features
Pelican
Storyblok
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Storyblok does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for multi-site functionality.
Storyblok does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for multi-site functionality.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
🟢 Multi-language : Support natively.
Storyblok supports multi-language natively, allowing users to easily create and manage content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
Storyblok supports multi-language natively, allowing users to easily create and manage content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through third-party plugins, enhancing SEO capabilities and ensuring proper indexing of content.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through third-party plugins, enhancing SEO capabilities and ensuring proper indexing of content.
When choosing between Pelican and Storyblok, consider your technical expertise and content management requirements. If you value flexibility and customization, Pelican may be the right choice. However, if you prioritize ease of use and collaboration between content creators and developers, Storyblok could be the better option. Ultimately, the decision should align with your specific goals and preferences.