Pelican vs Plone
Please select two different options.
Pelican and Plone are both content management systems, but they cater to different needs. Pelican is a static site generator that is simple and lightweight, ideal for small websites and blogs. On the other hand, Plone is a robust and feature-rich CMS designed for larger, more complex websites and intranets.
General information
Pelican
Plone
Introduction :
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Introduction :
Plone is an open-source content management system that was launched in 2001. It is known for its security, scalability, and flexibility, making it a popular choice for large organizations and government agencies. Plone's user-friendly interface and robust features, such as version control and workflow management, have contributed to its popularity among users looking for a reliable and customizable CMS solution.
Plone is an open-source content management system that was launched in 2001. It is known for its security, scalability, and flexibility, making it a popular choice for large organizations and government agencies. Plone's user-friendly interface and robust features, such as version control and workflow management, have contributed to its popularity among users looking for a reliable and customizable CMS solution.
Advantages :
- Easy to use and beginner-friendly interface
- Fast loading times for websites
- Strong security features to protect content
- Customizable themes and plugins for flexibility
- Good for small to medium-sized websites
Advantages :
- Highly customizable and flexible design options
- Strong security features to protect content
- Easy integration with third-party applications
- Scalable for growing websites and businesses
- Active community for support and updates
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steeper learning curve compared to others
- Lack of built-in SEO features
- Limited plugin and theme options
- Less user-friendly interface compared to competitors
Disadvantages :
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Limited number of available plugins
- Not as widely supported as other platforms
- Customization options can be overwhelming
- Requires more technical expertise to maintain
Website users : Thousands
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Website users : Approximately 0.1% of websites
Plone is used by a small percentage of websites compared to other popular platforms like WordPress and Shopify.
Plone is used by a small percentage of websites compared to other popular platforms like WordPress and Shopify.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
🔴 Difficulty : Hard.
Plone has a steep learning curve and requires technical skills to get started, making it more challenging compared to other platforms.
Plone has a steep learning curve and requires technical skills to get started, making it more challenging compared to other platforms.
Year launched : 2002
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Year launched : 2001
Plone was launched in 2001, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Plone was launched in 2001, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Official website :
https://www.pelicanweb.org/
Official website :
https://plone.org/
Commercial details
Pelican
Plone
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
🟢 Open source : Fully.
Plone is fully open source, written in Python. The platform allows for complete customization and contribution from the community.
Plone is fully open source, written in Python. The platform allows for complete customization and contribution from the community.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Plone offers a free, open-source option with no licensing fees. It provides robust features and customization capabilities for users.
Plone offers a free, open-source option with no licensing fees. It provides robust features and customization capabilities for users.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
⚪ Paid option : Unknown.
Plone offers various services and support options, but specific details about a paid option are unclear. Further research is needed for comparison.
Plone offers various services and support options, but specific details about a paid option are unclear. Further research is needed for comparison.
Platform details
Pelican
Plone
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
⚪ Hosted : Unknown.
There may be hosted options available for Plone, but specific details on pricing and providers are unclear.
There may be hosted options available for Plone, but specific details on pricing and providers are unclear.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Plone can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
Plone can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Plone does not natively support headless functionality but can be achieved through the use of plugins or APIs.
Plone does not natively support headless functionality but can be achieved through the use of plugins or APIs.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
Static content generation is possible in Plone through the use of popular plugins, offering flexibility and customization options.
Static content generation is possible in Plone through the use of popular plugins, offering flexibility and customization options.
Key features
Pelican
Plone
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Plone excels in content management with its robust native features, making it a top choice for efficiently organizing and maintaining content.
Plone excels in content management with its robust native features, making it a top choice for efficiently organizing and maintaining content.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Plone can be used for blogging with the help of third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
Plone can be used for blogging with the help of third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Plone can be used for e-commerce with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering a range of features for online stores.
Plone can be used for e-commerce with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering a range of features for online stores.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Plone can support community/forum features through add-ons like Ploneboard, but may require additional setup compared to platforms with native support.
Plone can support community/forum features through add-ons like Ploneboard, but may require additional setup compared to platforms with native support.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions and paywalls can be implemented in Plone through various third-party plugins/extensions for enhanced functionality.
Content subscriptions and paywalls can be implemented in Plone through various third-party plugins/extensions for enhanced functionality.
Other features
Pelican
Plone
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Multi-site functionality in Plone is typically achieved through the use of third-party add-ons or plugins, offering flexibility and customization options.
Multi-site functionality in Plone is typically achieved through the use of third-party add-ons or plugins, offering flexibility and customization options.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
🟢 Multi-language : Support natively.
Plone natively supports multi-language capabilities, allowing for easy management of content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
Plone natively supports multi-language capabilities, allowing for easy management of content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Plone does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
Plone does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
When choosing between Pelican and Plone, consider the size and complexity of your project. If you need a quick and easy solution for a small website, Pelican is a great choice. However, if you require advanced features and scalability for a larger project, Plone would be the better option. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your specific requirements and goals.