KeystoneJS vs Pelican
Please select two different options.
KeystoneJS and Pelican are both content management systems, but they cater to different needs. KeystoneJS is a powerful Node.js-based CMS that offers a flexible and customizable platform for building dynamic websites and applications. On the other hand, Pelican is a static site generator that focuses on simplicity and speed, making it ideal for blogs and small websites.
General information
KeystoneJS
Pelican
Introduction :
KeystoneJS is a powerful open-source content management system and web application framework that was launched in 2013. It is popular for its flexibility, ease of use, and robust features such as database management, authentication, and dynamic routing. KeystoneJS is widely used for building dynamic websites and web applications, making it a popular choice among developers looking for a scalable and customizable platform.
KeystoneJS is a powerful open-source content management system and web application framework that was launched in 2013. It is popular for its flexibility, ease of use, and robust features such as database management, authentication, and dynamic routing. KeystoneJS is widely used for building dynamic websites and web applications, making it a popular choice among developers looking for a scalable and customizable platform.
Introduction :
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Advantages :
- Easy to use and customize
- Built-in user authentication and access control
- Flexible content modeling with schemas
- Active community and support
- Scalable for large projects
Advantages :
- Easy to use and beginner-friendly interface
- Fast loading times for websites
- Strong security features to protect content
- Customizable themes and plugins for flexibility
- Good for small to medium-sized websites
Disadvantages :
- Limited theme options
- Steeper learning curve compared to some
- Less community support than WordPress
- Not as customizable as other platforms
- Limited plugins and extensions available
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steeper learning curve compared to others
- Lack of built-in SEO features
- Limited plugin and theme options
- Less user-friendly interface compared to competitors
Website users : Thousands
KeystoneJS is used by thousands of websites worldwide, making it a popular choice among developers for building dynamic web applications.
KeystoneJS is used by thousands of websites worldwide, making it a popular choice among developers for building dynamic web applications.
Website users : Thousands
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
KeystoneJS requires some familiarity with Node.js and MongoDB, making it average in terms of ease of getting started compared to other CMS platforms.
KeystoneJS requires some familiarity with Node.js and MongoDB, making it average in terms of ease of getting started compared to other CMS platforms.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Year launched : 2013
KeystoneJS was launched in 2013, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems.
KeystoneJS was launched in 2013, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems.
Year launched : 2002
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Official website :
https://keystonejs.com/
Official website :
https://www.pelicanweb.org/
Commercial details
KeystoneJS
Pelican
🟢 Open source : Fully.
KeystoneJS is fully open source and written in JavaScript, allowing for complete customization and community contributions.
KeystoneJS is fully open source and written in JavaScript, allowing for complete customization and community contributions.
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
⚪ Free option : Unknown.
KeystoneJS offers a free option, but the specifics regarding limitations or features of the free plan are unclear.
KeystoneJS offers a free option, but the specifics regarding limitations or features of the free plan are unclear.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
KeystoneJS offers a paid option for additional features, hosting, and support, providing users with more comprehensive and tailored solutions.
KeystoneJS offers a paid option for additional features, hosting, and support, providing users with more comprehensive and tailored solutions.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Platform details
KeystoneJS
Pelican
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
KeystoneJS offers a hosted option through various third-party vendors, providing users with the convenience of managed hosting services.
KeystoneJS offers a hosted option through various third-party vendors, providing users with the convenience of managed hosting services.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
KeystoneJS can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
KeystoneJS can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development and content management capabilities.
KeystoneJS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development and content management capabilities.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
Static content generation is possible in KeystoneJS through plugins, offering flexibility for users to generate static content if needed.
Static content generation is possible in KeystoneJS through plugins, offering flexibility for users to generate static content if needed.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Key features
KeystoneJS
Pelican
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
KeystoneJS excels in content management with its native capabilities, offering robust tools for creating, editing, and organizing content efficiently.
KeystoneJS excels in content management with its native capabilities, offering robust tools for creating, editing, and organizing content efficiently.
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS can be used for blogging with the help of plugins like keystone-blog, offering basic blogging functionality but may require additional customization.
KeystoneJS can be used for blogging with the help of plugins like keystone-blog, offering basic blogging functionality but may require additional customization.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
KeystoneJS is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. It may require extensive customization or integration with third-party plugins.
KeystoneJS is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. It may require extensive customization or integration with third-party plugins.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS can be used for a community/forum with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering flexibility and customization options.
KeystoneJS can be used for a community/forum with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering flexibility and customization options.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be implemented using third-party plugins/extensions in KeystoneJS, enhancing its functionality in this area.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be implemented using third-party plugins/extensions in KeystoneJS, enhancing its functionality in this area.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Other features
KeystoneJS
Pelican
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved in KeystoneJS through the use of third-party plugins or extensions.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved in KeystoneJS through the use of third-party plugins or extensions.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multilingual support can be achieved via plugins like keystone-multilingual or keystone-localisation, enhancing native capabilities.
Multilingual support can be achieved via plugins like keystone-multilingual or keystone-localisation, enhancing native capabilities.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through a popular 3rd party plugin or extension, enhancing the SEO capabilities of KeystoneJS.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through a popular 3rd party plugin or extension, enhancing the SEO capabilities of KeystoneJS.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
When choosing between KeystoneJS and Pelican, consider the complexity and scalability of your project. KeystoneJS is better suited for large, dynamic websites that require extensive customization and functionality. Pelican, on the other hand, is perfect for simple, static sites that prioritize speed and ease of use. Ultimately, the right choice depends on the specific requirements of your project.