Jekyll vs KeystoneJS
Please select two different options.
Jekyll and KeystoneJS are both popular content management systems, but they cater to different needs. Jekyll is a static site generator that is great for simple websites and blogs, while KeystoneJS is a dynamic CMS that is more suitable for complex web applications.
General information
Jekyll
KeystoneJS
Introduction :
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Introduction :
KeystoneJS is a powerful open-source content management system and web application framework that was launched in 2013. It is popular for its flexibility, ease of use, and robust features such as database management, authentication, and dynamic routing. KeystoneJS is widely used for building dynamic websites and web applications, making it a popular choice among developers looking for a scalable and customizable platform.
KeystoneJS is a powerful open-source content management system and web application framework that was launched in 2013. It is popular for its flexibility, ease of use, and robust features such as database management, authentication, and dynamic routing. KeystoneJS is widely used for building dynamic websites and web applications, making it a popular choice among developers looking for a scalable and customizable platform.
Advantages :
- Easy to use and setup for beginners
- Large community for support and resources
- Customizable with themes and plugins
- Fast performance with static site generation
- Secure with built-in features and updates
Advantages :
- Easy to use and customize
- Built-in user authentication and access control
- Flexible content modeling with schemas
- Active community and support
- Scalable for large projects
Disadvantages :
- Limited built-in features compared to others
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Less user-friendly interface for non-developers
- Limited theme options and customization capabilities
- Smaller community support and resources
Disadvantages :
- Limited theme options
- Steeper learning curve compared to some
- Less community support than WordPress
- Not as customizable as other platforms
- Limited plugins and extensions available
Website users : Over 1 million websites
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
Website users : Thousands
KeystoneJS is used by thousands of websites worldwide, making it a popular choice among developers for building dynamic web applications.
KeystoneJS is used by thousands of websites worldwide, making it a popular choice among developers for building dynamic web applications.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
KeystoneJS requires some familiarity with Node.js and MongoDB, making it average in terms of ease of getting started compared to other CMS platforms.
KeystoneJS requires some familiarity with Node.js and MongoDB, making it average in terms of ease of getting started compared to other CMS platforms.
Year launched : 2008
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Year launched : 2013
KeystoneJS was launched in 2013, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems.
KeystoneJS was launched in 2013, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems.
Official website :
https://jekyllrb.com/
Official website :
https://keystonejs.com/
Commercial details
Jekyll
KeystoneJS
🟢 Open source : Fully.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
🟢 Open source : Fully.
KeystoneJS is fully open source and written in JavaScript, allowing for complete customization and community contributions.
KeystoneJS is fully open source and written in JavaScript, allowing for complete customization and community contributions.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
⚪ Free option : Unknown.
KeystoneJS offers a free option, but the specifics regarding limitations or features of the free plan are unclear.
KeystoneJS offers a free option, but the specifics regarding limitations or features of the free plan are unclear.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
KeystoneJS offers a paid option for additional features, hosting, and support, providing users with more comprehensive and tailored solutions.
KeystoneJS offers a paid option for additional features, hosting, and support, providing users with more comprehensive and tailored solutions.
Platform details
Jekyll
KeystoneJS
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
KeystoneJS offers a hosted option through various third-party vendors, providing users with the convenience of managed hosting services.
KeystoneJS offers a hosted option through various third-party vendors, providing users with the convenience of managed hosting services.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
KeystoneJS can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
KeystoneJS can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users flexibility and control over their hosting environment.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development and content management capabilities.
KeystoneJS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development and content management capabilities.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
Static content generation is possible in KeystoneJS through plugins, offering flexibility for users to generate static content if needed.
Static content generation is possible in KeystoneJS through plugins, offering flexibility for users to generate static content if needed.
Key features
Jekyll
KeystoneJS
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
KeystoneJS excels in content management with its native capabilities, offering robust tools for creating, editing, and organizing content efficiently.
KeystoneJS excels in content management with its native capabilities, offering robust tools for creating, editing, and organizing content efficiently.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS can be used for blogging with the help of plugins like keystone-blog, offering basic blogging functionality but may require additional customization.
KeystoneJS can be used for blogging with the help of plugins like keystone-blog, offering basic blogging functionality but may require additional customization.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
KeystoneJS is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. It may require extensive customization or integration with third-party plugins.
KeystoneJS is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. It may require extensive customization or integration with third-party plugins.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
KeystoneJS can be used for a community/forum with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering flexibility and customization options.
KeystoneJS can be used for a community/forum with the help of third-party plugins/extensions, offering flexibility and customization options.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be implemented using third-party plugins/extensions in KeystoneJS, enhancing its functionality in this area.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be implemented using third-party plugins/extensions in KeystoneJS, enhancing its functionality in this area.
Other features
Jekyll
KeystoneJS
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved in KeystoneJS through the use of third-party plugins or extensions.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved in KeystoneJS through the use of third-party plugins or extensions.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multilingual support can be achieved via plugins like keystone-multilingual or keystone-localisation, enhancing native capabilities.
Multilingual support can be achieved via plugins like keystone-multilingual or keystone-localisation, enhancing native capabilities.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through a popular 3rd party plugin or extension, enhancing the SEO capabilities of KeystoneJS.
XML sitemaps can be implemented through a popular 3rd party plugin or extension, enhancing the SEO capabilities of KeystoneJS.
When deciding between Jekyll and KeystoneJS, consider the complexity of your project. If you need a simple and fast website, Jekyll is the way to go. However, if you require more advanced features and customization options, KeystoneJS may be the better choice. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the specific requirements of your project.