Hugo vs Jekyll
Please select two different options.
Hugo and Jekyll are both popular static site generators used for creating fast and secure websites. Hugo is known for its speed and simplicity, while Jekyll offers a more flexible and customizable approach to website development.
General information
Hugo
Jekyll
Introduction :
Hugo is a static site generator that was launched in 2013 and has gained popularity for its speed and simplicity. It is an open-source platform that allows users to create fast and secure websites with ease. Hugo is known for its flexibility and performance, making it a popular choice among developers and content creators looking for a reliable and efficient platform for their projects.
Hugo is a static site generator that was launched in 2013 and has gained popularity for its speed and simplicity. It is an open-source platform that allows users to create fast and secure websites with ease. Hugo is known for its flexibility and performance, making it a popular choice among developers and content creators looking for a reliable and efficient platform for their projects.
Introduction :
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Advantages :
- Fast static site generation
- Lightweight and efficient performance
- Easy customization and theming options
- Secure and reliable platform
- Excellent support and active community
Advantages :
- Easy to use and setup for beginners
- Large community for support and resources
- Customizable with themes and plugins
- Fast performance with static site generation
- Secure with built-in features and updates
Disadvantages :
- Limited built-in features compared to others
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Less user-friendly interface for non-technical users
- Limited plugin and theme options
- Less community support and resources available
Disadvantages :
- Limited built-in features compared to others
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Less user-friendly interface for non-developers
- Limited theme options and customization capabilities
- Smaller community support and resources
Website users : Less than 1% of websites
Hugo is a niche platform with a small user base compared to other popular content management systems like WordPress and Shopify.
Hugo is a niche platform with a small user base compared to other popular content management systems like WordPress and Shopify.
Website users : Over 1 million websites
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Hugo requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with the command line interface, but resources and documentation are available for support.
Getting started with Hugo requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with the command line interface, but resources and documentation are available for support.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
Year launched : 2013
Hugo was launched in 2013, making it a relatively newer platform compared to others in the market.
Hugo was launched in 2013, making it a relatively newer platform compared to others in the market.
Year launched : 2008
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Official website :
https://gohugo.io/
Official website :
https://jekyllrb.com/
Commercial details
Hugo
Jekyll
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Hugo is partially open source, with the core software being open but some additional features and themes requiring a license.
Hugo is partially open source, with the core software being open but some additional features and themes requiring a license.
🟢 Open source : Fully.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
⚪ Free option : Unknown.
It is unclear if there is a free option available for Hugo. Further research is needed to determine the pricing structure.
It is unclear if there is a free option available for Hugo. Further research is needed to determine the pricing structure.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Hugo offers a paid option for users looking for additional features, support, or hosted solutions, providing flexibility and customization for a fee.
Hugo offers a paid option for users looking for additional features, support, or hosted solutions, providing flexibility and customization for a fee.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
Platform details
Hugo
Jekyll
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
There are hosted options available for Hugo, both free and paid, allowing users to easily deploy and manage their websites.
There are hosted options available for Hugo, both free and paid, allowing users to easily deploy and manage their websites.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Self-hosting is possible with Hugo, allowing users to have full control over their website and choose their own hosting provider.
Self-hosting is possible with Hugo, allowing users to have full control over their website and choose their own hosting provider.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Hugo does not natively support headless systems but can be integrated with headless features through plugins or APIs.
Hugo does not natively support headless systems but can be integrated with headless features through plugins or APIs.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Hugo supports static content generation out of the box, making it a powerful tool for creating fast and efficient websites.
Hugo supports static content generation out of the box, making it a powerful tool for creating fast and efficient websites.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Key features
Hugo
Jekyll
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
Hugo is a static site generator, so content management is not native but can be achieved through plugins for added functionality.
Hugo is a static site generator, so content management is not native but can be achieved through plugins for added functionality.
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Hugo is a good platform for blogging when enhanced by popular 3rd party plugins/extensions for additional features and functionality.
Hugo is a good platform for blogging when enhanced by popular 3rd party plugins/extensions for additional features and functionality.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
Hugo is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. However, it can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions.
Hugo is not specifically designed for e-commerce, lacking native features for online stores. However, it can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Hugo can support community forums with third-party plugins like Discourse or Vanilla Forums, offering robust features and customization options.
Hugo can support community forums with third-party plugins like Discourse or Vanilla Forums, offering robust features and customization options.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing functionality beyond native capabilities.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing functionality beyond native capabilities.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
Other features
Hugo
Jekyll
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Multi-site functionality is supported via a popular third-party plugin, providing flexibility for managing multiple sites within Hugo.
Multi-site functionality is supported via a popular third-party plugin, providing flexibility for managing multiple sites within Hugo.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multi-language support in Hugo is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering flexibility but requiring additional setup and maintenance.
Multi-language support in Hugo is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering flexibility but requiring additional setup and maintenance.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
XML sitemap functionality can be added through popular third-party plugins, enhancing SEO capabilities for Hugo websites.
XML sitemap functionality can be added through popular third-party plugins, enhancing SEO capabilities for Hugo websites.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
When choosing between Hugo and Jekyll, consider your specific needs and technical expertise. If you prioritize speed and ease of use, Hugo may be the better choice. However, if customization and flexibility are key factors for your website, Jekyll might be the way to go. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your individual requirements and preferences.