Cockpit vs Pelican
Please select two different options.
Cockpit and Pelican are both content management systems, but they cater to different needs. Cockpit is a headless CMS that offers a user-friendly interface for managing content, while Pelican is a static site generator that focuses on simplicity and speed.
General information
Cockpit
Pelican
Introduction :
Cockpit is a modern and lightweight headless CMS that was launched in 2013. It is open-source and gaining popularity for its user-friendly interface, flexibility, and robust features. Cockpit allows users to easily manage content and data for their websites or applications. Its simplicity and scalability make it a preferred choice for developers looking for a customizable and efficient CMS solution.
Cockpit is a modern and lightweight headless CMS that was launched in 2013. It is open-source and gaining popularity for its user-friendly interface, flexibility, and robust features. Cockpit allows users to easily manage content and data for their websites or applications. Its simplicity and scalability make it a preferred choice for developers looking for a customizable and efficient CMS solution.
Introduction :
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Pelican is a static site generator that is open source and was first released in 2010. It is popular for its simplicity, speed, and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for developers who want to create fast and secure websites. Pelican allows users to write content in Markdown or reStructuredText and offers a range of plugins and themes for customization.
Advantages :
- User-friendly interface for easy navigation
- Customizable dashboard for personalized experience
- Integration with various tools and plugins
- Real-time data analytics for informed decision-making
- Collaborative features for team efficiency
Advantages :
- Easy to use and beginner-friendly interface
- Fast loading times for websites
- Strong security features to protect content
- Customizable themes and plugins for flexibility
- Good for small to medium-sized websites
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Lack of advanced features compared to others
- Limited support for third-party integrations
- Higher cost compared to some other platforms
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steeper learning curve compared to others
- Lack of built-in SEO features
- Limited plugin and theme options
- Less user-friendly interface compared to competitors
Website users : X% of websites
Cockpit is used by a small percentage of websites compared to other platforms in the market.
Cockpit is used by a small percentage of websites compared to other platforms in the market.
Website users : Thousands
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
Pelican is used by thousands of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems for website creation and management.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Cockpit may require some initial learning, but the user-friendly interface helps streamline the process for most users.
Getting started with Cockpit may require some initial learning, but the user-friendly interface helps streamline the process for most users.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Getting started with Pelican requires some technical knowledge and familiarity with static site generators, but resources are available for support.
Year launched : 2014
Cockpit was launched in 2014, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems on the market.
Cockpit was launched in 2014, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to other content management systems on the market.
Year launched : 2002
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Pelican was launched in 2002, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create and manage websites.
Official website :
https://www.cockpit-cms.org/
Official website :
https://www.pelicanweb.org/
Commercial details
Cockpit
Pelican
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Cockpit is partially open source, with the core platform being open source but some premium features requiring a paid license.
Cockpit is partially open source, with the core platform being open source but some premium features requiring a paid license.
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
Pelican is partially open source, with the core codebase being fully open source, but some plugins and themes may have different licenses.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Cockpit offers a free self-hosted option with basic features. Additional features may require paid upgrades.
Cockpit offers a free self-hosted option with basic features. Additional features may require paid upgrades.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
Pelican offers a free self-hosted option with no limitations on features, making it a cost-effective choice for users looking to manage their own content.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Cockpit offers a paid option for additional features and support, providing users with more advanced functionalities and assistance.
Cockpit offers a paid option for additional features and support, providing users with more advanced functionalities and assistance.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Pelican offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support, providing a more comprehensive experience for those willing to invest.
Platform details
Cockpit
Pelican
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Cockpit offers a hosted option for users, providing convenience and ease of use without the need for self-hosting.
Cockpit offers a hosted option for users, providing convenience and ease of use without the need for self-hosting.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
Pelican offers a hosted option for users looking for a convenient and managed solution for their website hosting needs.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Cockpit can be self-hosted, giving users more control over their hosting environment and potentially reducing costs through self-management.
Cockpit can be self-hosted, giving users more control over their hosting environment and potentially reducing costs through self-management.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
Pelican can be self-hosted on various 3rd party vendors, giving users more control over their hosting environment.
⚪ Headless CMS : Unknown.
Cockpit may have headless features via an API, but it is not explicitly stated whether it is a headless system or not.
Cockpit may have headless features via an API, but it is not explicitly stated whether it is a headless system or not.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
Pelican does not natively support headless features but can be integrated with plugins or APIs for headless functionality.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
Cockpit does not natively support static content generation but can potentially achieve this functionality via a popular plugin.
Cockpit does not natively support static content generation but can potentially achieve this functionality via a popular plugin.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Pelican natively supports static content generation, making it efficient and reliable for creating static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Key features
Cockpit
Pelican
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Cockpit offers native content management capabilities, making it a strong platform for managing content without the need for additional plugins.
Cockpit offers native content management capabilities, making it a strong platform for managing content without the need for additional plugins.
🟢 Content management : Support natively.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
Pelican is a good platform for managing content as it offers native features specifically designed for content management tasks.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Cockpit can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering a decent platform with additional features for bloggers.
Cockpit can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering a decent platform with additional features for bloggers.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
Pelican can be enhanced by third-party plugins for blogging functionality, offering flexibility and customization options for bloggers.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Cockpit can be used for e-commerce with the help of popular plugins/extensions, enhancing its capabilities for online sales.
Cockpit can be used for e-commerce with the help of popular plugins/extensions, enhancing its capabilities for online sales.
🟡 E-commerce : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
Pelican can be used for e-commerce with plugins like Pelican-Commerce, but it may require additional setup compared to dedicated e-commerce platforms.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Cockpit can support a community/forum with the right plugin, but it may not have native features for robust community interactions like some other platforms.
Cockpit can support a community/forum with the right plugin, but it may not have native features for robust community interactions like some other platforms.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
Pelican can support a community/forum with plugins like Disqus, but lacks native features for robust community engagement compared to other platforms.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Supports content subscriptions/paywalls through popular third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing functionality for monetizing content effectively.
Supports content subscriptions/paywalls through popular third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing functionality for monetizing content effectively.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Pelican does not natively support content subscriptions/paywalls but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for this functionality.
Other features
Cockpit
Pelican
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved via popular third-party plugins, enhancing the core capabilities of the Cockpit CMS for managing multiple sites.
Multi-site functionality can be achieved via popular third-party plugins, enhancing the core capabilities of the Cockpit CMS for managing multiple sites.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
Support for multi-site in Pelican is typically achieved through third-party plugins, offering enhanced functionality for managing multiple sites within the platform.
🟢 Multi-language : Support natively.
Cockpit natively supports multi-language functionality, allowing users to easily manage content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
Cockpit natively supports multi-language functionality, allowing users to easily manage content in multiple languages without the need for additional plugins.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
Pelican does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with plugins like Pelican-i18n for multi-language functionality.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Support for XML sitemaps can be added through popular third-party plugins, enhancing the functionality of the Cockpit platform.
Support for XML sitemaps can be added through popular third-party plugins, enhancing the functionality of the Cockpit platform.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
Support for XML sitemaps can be enhanced by popular third-party plugins/extensions in the Pelican ecosystem.
When choosing between Cockpit and Pelican, consider your specific requirements. If you need a flexible CMS with a graphical interface, Cockpit may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a lightweight and fast static site generator, Pelican could be the ideal solution. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your project’s unique needs and goals.