ButterCMS vs Jekyll
Please select two different options.
ButterCMS is a headless content management system that offers a user-friendly interface for creating and managing content. On the other hand, Jekyll is a static site generator that allows for easy creation of static websites using Markdown and Liquid templating.
General information
ButterCMS
Jekyll
Introduction :
ButterCMS is a headless content management system that was launched in 2014. It offers a user-friendly interface and robust API for developers to easily integrate content into their websites and applications. ButterCMS is not open source but is popular for its simplicity and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for businesses looking to streamline their content management processes.
ButterCMS is a headless content management system that was launched in 2014. It offers a user-friendly interface and robust API for developers to easily integrate content into their websites and applications. ButterCMS is not open source but is popular for its simplicity and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for businesses looking to streamline their content management processes.
Introduction :
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Jekyll is a static site generator that was launched in 2008 and is open source. It has gained popularity for its simplicity, speed, and security. Jekyll is widely used by developers and bloggers who prefer a lightweight and flexible platform for creating websites. Its ease of use and compatibility with version control systems like Git make it a popular choice for those looking to build fast and secure websites.
Advantages :
- Easy to use and navigate interface
- Seamless integration with existing websites
- Robust API for customization and flexibility
- Fast content delivery with CDN
- Scalable for growing businesses
Advantages :
- Easy to use and setup for beginners
- Large community for support and resources
- Customizable with themes and plugins
- Fast performance with static site generation
- Secure with built-in features and updates
Disadvantages :
- Limited customization options
- Steeper learning curve compared to some platforms
- Higher cost for advanced features
- Limited third-party integrations
- Not as widely supported as other platforms
Disadvantages :
- Limited built-in features compared to others
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Less user-friendly interface for non-developers
- Limited theme options and customization capabilities
- Smaller community support and resources
Website users : Thousands of websites
ButterCMS is used by a significant number of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems.
ButterCMS is used by a significant number of websites, making it a popular choice among content management systems.
Website users : Over 1 million websites
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
Jekyll is a popular choice for static websites, with a significant user base due to its simplicity and flexibility.
🟢 Difficulty : Easy.
ButterCMS offers a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it easy for users to get started without needing advanced technical skills.
ButterCMS offers a user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation, making it easy for users to get started without needing advanced technical skills.
🟡 Difficulty : Average.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
Getting started with Jekyll requires basic knowledge of HTML, CSS, and Markdown. Some technical skills are needed, but resources are available for assistance.
Year launched : 2014
ButterCMS was launched in 2014, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to more established CMS platforms.
ButterCMS was launched in 2014, positioning it as a relatively newer option compared to more established CMS platforms.
Year launched : 2008
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Jekyll was launched in 2008, making it one of the earlier content management systems available for users to create websites.
Official website :
https://buttercms.com/
Official website :
https://jekyllrb.com/
Commercial details
ButterCMS
Jekyll
🟡 Open source : Partially.
ButterCMS is not fully open source, but offers some level of customization and flexibility for developers to work with.
ButterCMS is not fully open source, but offers some level of customization and flexibility for developers to work with.
🟢 Open source : Fully.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
Jekyll is fully open source, written in Ruby. The entire platform is available for modification and customization by the community.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
ButterCMS offers a free option with limited features, making it a good choice for those on a budget or looking to test the platform.
ButterCMS offers a free option with limited features, making it a good choice for those on a budget or looking to test the platform.
🟢 Free option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
Jekyll offers a free option with basic features. Users can host their site for free on platforms like GitHub Pages.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
ButterCMS offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support beyond the free plan.
ButterCMS offers a paid option for users looking for additional features and support beyond the free plan.
🟢 Paid option : Yes.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
Jekyll offers a paid option for added features and support, providing users with more customization and assistance for their websites.
Platform details
ButterCMS
Jekyll
⚪ Hosted : Unknown.
ButterCMS offers various pricing plans, but it is unclear if there is a fully hosted option available directly from ButterCMS.
ButterCMS offers various pricing plans, but it is unclear if there is a fully hosted option available directly from ButterCMS.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
Jekyll can be hosted on various platforms, including free options like GitHub Pages or paid options through hosting providers.
⚪ Self host : Unknown.
ButterCMS does not offer a self-hosting option, but there may be third-party vendors available for hosting services.
ButterCMS does not offer a self-hosting option, but there may be third-party vendors available for hosting services.
🟢 Self host : Yes.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
Self-hosting is possible with Jekyll, allowing users to choose their own hosting provider for more control and customization.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development while still utilizing its content management capabilities.
ButterCMS supports headless features via its API, allowing for decoupled front-end development while still utilizing its content management capabilities.
🟡 Headless CMS : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
Jekyll does not natively support headless functionality but can be extended with plugins to enable headless features via APIs.
🟡 Static content generation : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS does not natively support static content generation but can be achieved perhaps via a popular plugin.
ButterCMS does not natively support static content generation but can be achieved perhaps via a popular plugin.
🟢 Static content generation : Support natively.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Jekyll natively supports static content generation, making it efficient for creating and managing static websites without the need for additional plugins.
Key features
ButterCMS
Jekyll
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS is a good platform for managing content with its easy-to-use plugin integration, but it may require additional setup compared to native solutions.
ButterCMS is a good platform for managing content with its easy-to-use plugin integration, but it may require additional setup compared to native solutions.
🟡 Content management : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
Jekyll requires plugins for advanced content management features, making it less user-friendly compared to platforms with native content management capabilities.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS is primarily a headless CMS with a focus on content delivery. Blogging functionality can be enhanced through plugins.
ButterCMS is primarily a headless CMS with a focus on content delivery. Blogging functionality can be enhanced through plugins.
🟡 Blogging : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
Jekyll can be enhanced by popular plugins for blogging features, but it may require additional setup compared to platforms with native blogging capabilities.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
ButterCMS is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality, lacking native features for online stores. It may require third-party plugins for such capabilities.
ButterCMS is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality, lacking native features for online stores. It may require third-party plugins for such capabilities.
🔴 E-commerce : Not supported.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
Jekyll is not specifically designed for e-commerce functionality. It may require significant customization or integration with third-party plugins for e-commerce capabilities.
🔴 Community forum : Not supported.
ButterCMS does not have native support for community/forum features. It may require integration with third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
ButterCMS does not have native support for community/forum features. It may require integration with third-party plugins/extensions for this functionality.
🟡 Community forum : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
Jekyll can be used for a community/forum with the help of plugins like Jekyll Talk, but it requires additional setup compared to platforms with native forum features.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Supports content subscriptions/paywalls through third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for monetizing content.
Supports content subscriptions/paywalls through third-party plugins, offering flexibility and customization options for monetizing content.
🟡 Content subscription : Supported via plugin.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
Content subscriptions/paywalls can be supported through third-party plugins/extensions, enhancing Jekyll's functionality in this area.
Other features
ButterCMS
Jekyll
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions for multi-site functionality.
ButterCMS does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced with third-party plugins/extensions for multi-site functionality.
🟡 Multi-site : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
Jekyll does not support multi-site natively but can be enhanced by popular plugins like jekyll-multilingual and jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for multi-language functionality.
ButterCMS does not natively support multi-language but can be enhanced with third-party plugins for multi-language functionality.
🟡 Multi-language : Supported via plugin.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
Multi-language support in Jekyll can be achieved through plugins like jekyll-multiple-languages-plugin, offering flexibility for internationalization needs.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
ButterCMS does not support XML sitemaps natively but can be implemented using popular third-party plugins or extensions.
ButterCMS does not support XML sitemaps natively but can be implemented using popular third-party plugins or extensions.
🟡 XML Sitemaps : Supported via plugin.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
Jekyll does not natively support XML sitemaps but can be enhanced with popular plugins like jekyll-sitemap for this functionality.
When choosing between ButterCMS and Jekyll, consider your specific needs and technical expertise. ButterCMS is ideal for those looking for a more traditional CMS experience, while Jekyll is great for developers comfortable with coding and seeking a lightweight solution for static websites.